SHARE

| Oct-06-2021

CENVAT Credit eligible on Product Recall Policy expenses

In Bhavani Industries v. CCE & ST, Rajkot [Excise Appeal No.10416 of 2019 dated September 21, 2021], Bhavani Industries (“the Appellant”) filed an appeal impugning Order No. OIA-RAJ-EXCUS-000-APP-023-2018-19 dated April 18, 2018 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Rajkot ("the Respondent").

Issue: Eligibility of Central Value Added Tax Credit (“CENVAT Credit”) on Product Liability and Product Recall Insurance Policy.

The Appellant counsel relied on an erstwhile judgement [M/s. Bhavani Industries V/s. C.C.E. & S.T. Rajkot 2018 (10) TMI 626 CESTAT Ahmedabad] wherein the matter was adjudged in the favor of the Appellant.

The Respondent, as opposed to the contentions raised by the Appellant, reiterated the findings of the impugned order; wherein it was held that the expenses towards product recall policy expenses are not eligible for CENVAT credit.

After taking perusal of all the facts and evidences, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (“CESTAT”), Ahmedabad held that the Product Recall Policy expenses is born for the purpose of security of the goods and for this reason the service falls under the definition of input services and is therefore, eligible for CENVAT Credit.

Online GST Course by Bimal Jain

Recorded: Certified Advanced GST Course

Course Details: Certificate of Participation will be Provided, Free GST Updates on E-mail, WhatsApp, Telegram for 1 Year, Background Material and PPT will be Provided on the downloadable basis, Total 21 Recorded Sessions (60 Hours), will be available for 120 hours or 60 Days whichever expires earlier.

For Registration:- https://cutt.ly/hxjl5Cu

Recorded: GST Course on Exports, Deemed Exports, SEZ, Imports, Merchandise Exports, Inverted Duty Structure (including Refunds)

Course Details: 6 Online Recorded Sessions of 2.30Hrs each with Background Material (BGM)

For Registration:- https://cutt.ly/pvw7mzl

For more details,
Call:
+91-8076563802 | E-mail: intern@a2ztaxcorp.com | Web: www.a2ztaxcorp.in

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.

Similar reads

Appellant is entitled to interest from the date of deposit to the date of refund

The CESTAT, New Delhi in the matter of M/s BBM Impex Pvt. Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) [Customs Early Hearing Application No.50414 of 2022 with Customs Appeal No. 51662 of

Oct-06-2021

Read More

Waiver of pre-deposit is not tenable on account of financial inability

The CESTAT, New Delhi in the matter of M/s Prem Kumar Ojha v. Commissioner of Customs-Jaipur I [Customs Miscellaneous Application No. 50245 of 2022 dated July 04, 2022] held that, in view

Oct-06-2021

Read More

Excise duty cannot be demanded for clandestine removal based on third party evidence

The CESTAT, New Delhi in the matter of M/s Shri Shyam Ingot & Castings Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise [Excise Appeal No. 52550 of 2019-SM dated August 08, 2022] held

Oct-06-2021

Read More

Arbitrary valuation of goods not subjected to BIS specifications is invalid

The CESTAT, Chennai in the matter of M/s. SK Enterprises v The Commissioner of Customs [CUSTOMS APPEAL No. 40017 of 2022 dated June 24, 2022] set aside and held that the revaluation of the goods

Oct-06-2021

Read More

EOU not entitled to claim refund of TED on its own, may avail of the entitlements of DTA supplier specified in FTP

The Supreme Court of India in the matter of Sandoz Private Limited v. Union of India [Civil Appeal No. 3358 of 2020 dated January 4, 2020] upheld the decision of the Bombay High Court that Export

Oct-06-2021

Read More