| Sep-21-2021

Single Bench Order w.r.t Exemption provided to contribution upto Rs. 7,500/- PM to RWA under challenge before DB

In Union of India v. M/S TVH Lumbini Square Owners Association [W.A.Nos.2318 and 2321 of 2021 dated September 09, 2021], the current appeal has been filed against the Ld. Single Judge Bench ruling provided in M/S TVH Lumbini Square Owners Association v. Union of India [W.P.No.27100 of 2019 and WMP.No.26479 of 2019 dated July 01, 2021].

The Ld. Single Bench in the Hon’ble Madras High Court quashed the proceedings of M/s. M/S TVH Lumbini Square Owners Association [Order No.25/ARA/2019, dated June 21, 2019] of Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling (“TNAAR”). As per the said Ruling, it was held that housing societies may pay Goods and Services Tax (“GST”) only on the maintenance charges collected, which is more than Rs.7,500 per person per month and not on the entire amount.

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in W.P.No.27100 of 2019 and WMP.No.26479 of 2019 dated September 13, 2019 ruled in favour of RWA’s that the conclusion provided in the Order No.25/ARA/2019, dated June 21, 2019 by TNAAR as well as the Circular No. 109/28/2019- GST dated July 22, 2019 is contrary to the express language of the Entry in question and both stand quashed. It further clarified that it is only contributions to RWA in excess of Rs. 7,500 that would be taxable under GST Act.

The Ld. Division Bench of the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the current appeal noted that the entire transaction on which GST is applicable cannot be bifurcated. If the RWA member contribution exceeds Rs 7,500, the entire amount contributed would be subject to tax. Along with that, it went on to interpret the term “upto” by observing that there can be two interpretations; it either means exemption is granted only when the transaction value is less than Rs.7,500 or exemption is granted only for Rs.7,500 when the transaction value is more than 7,500.

Further, referring to S no. 28(c) of Notification No.25/2012-ST dated July 01, 2012, which provided for an exemption given for contributions upto Rs 5,000 per month per member to RWA, as well as referring to clarification issued through Circular no. 175/01/2014 – ST dated January 10, 2014 which state that if the contribution per member exceeds Rs. 5000/-, the entire contribution of such members whose contribution exceeds Rs. 5000 would be ineligible for exemption under the said notification.    

Further noted, that the legal issue is yet to be decided since the Ld. Single Bench not only quashed the proceedings of TNAAR but also the Circular issued by the Department.

Our Comments

  1. In M/s. M/S TVH Lumbini Square Owners Association [Order No. 25/ARA/2019, dated June 21, 2019] by TNAAR, it was held that entire contribution of members towards maintenance charges which is collected by the RWA in a case where it exceeds Rs 7500 a month is taxable and no exemption to this effect it to be provided.
  2. Being aggrieved by the ruling, the Petitioner approached the Hon’ble Madras High Court in M/S TVH Lumbini Square Owners Association v. Union of India [W.P.No.27100 of 2019 and WMP. No. 26479 of 2019 dated July 01, 2021] wherein not only the above mentioned ruling by TNAAR was quashed but Circular No.109/28/2019- GST dated July 22, 2019 was also quashed on the ground of the two being contrary to express language of the Entry 77 of Notification No. 12/2017-C.T.(R) dated June 28, 2017 (as amended) (“Services Exemption Notification”)

Online GST Course by Bimal Jain

Recorded: Certified Advanced GST Course

Course Details: Certificate of Participation will be Provided, Free GST Updates on E-mail, WhatsApp, Telegram for 1 Year, Background Material and PPT will be Provided on the downloadable basis, Total 21 Recorded Sessions (60 Hours), will be available for 120 hours or 60 Days whichever expires earlier.

For Registration:-

Recorded: GST Course on Exports, Deemed Exports, SEZ, Imports, Merchandise Exports, Inverted Duty Structure (including Refunds)

Course Details: 6 Online Recorded Sessions of 2.30Hrs each with Background Material (BGM)

For Registration:-

For more details,
+91-8076563802 | E-mail: | Web:

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.

Similar reads

Transfer Petition challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 16(2)(c) dismissed by Supreme Court

In Union of India v. M/s Cummins Technologies India Pvt Ltd and Ors etc. [Transfer Petitions(Civil) Nos.1481­-1482/2021 dated September 20, 2021] , the current transfer petitions have been filed


Read More

Rejection of bid in absence of GST registration cannot be termed as arbitrary as tender was for taxable supplies

In M/S. ASR Hospitals (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. [W.P. No. 17415 of 2021 dated September 22, 2021], Andhra Pradesh Medical Services Infrastructure Development Corporation


Read More

Orissa HC revokes GST Registration Cancellation on failure of Dept. to prove wrongful availment of ITC on fake invoices

In M/S. Bright Star Plastic Industries v. Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax [W.P. (C) No. 15265 of 2021 dated October 04, 2021], M/S. Bright Star Plastic Industries ("the Petitioner") has filed


Read More

Order of Preventive detention not sustainable on grounds of stale and illusory

In Naveen Kasera alias Naveen Agarwal v. Union of India Secretary Ministry of Finance W.P.(CRL) 630/2021 dated September 30, 2021] the current writ petition has been filed by Naveen Kasera alias


Read More

Mere dispatch of Order does not imply the service and receipt of Order

In M/S. Ghadshyam Enterprises v. Commissioner Central Goods & Services Tax [Service Tax Appeal No. 50783 of 2020 (SM) dated August 18, 2021], M/S. Ghadshyam Enterprises ("the Appellant") filed


Read More