SHARE

| Dec-09-2021

ITAT directed AO to delete the additions made on account of capitalization of royalty expenses as they were revenue in nature

The Hon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (“ITAT”) in the matter of Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India Pvt. Ltd. v.  ACIT, Circle: 4 (1) New Delhi [ITA. No. 477/Del/2021 dated November 09, 2021], directed the Assessing Officer (“AO”) to delete addition on account of capitalisation of royalty expenses by holding it to be revenue in nature as the assessee did not acquire any new asset or any new enduring benefit from it.

Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India Pvt. Ltd. (“the Appellant”) filed the current appeal being aggrieved of the assessment order dated March 03, 2021 passed by the National E-Assessment Centre under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the IT Act”) in which the additions were made to the total income of the Appellant. The Appellant is a subsidiary of Honda Motor Co. Ltd. Japan engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of motorcycles and Scooters. The Appellant had entered into certain international transactions with its associated enterprise and therefore reference was made to the transfer pricing officer to determine the arm’s-length price in respect of international transactions undertaken by the Appellant.

The Appellant has raised the issue in respect of capitalisation of the royalty expenses paid to him the amount of Japan wherein the Appellant has paid royalty expenditure of Rs 8,488,135,369/– in lieu of granting license under the royalty and technical know-how agreement and Rs 2,331,540,470/– in lieu of granting technical guidance under the technical know-how agreement. The Appellant has claimed that it did not acquire any new asset or any new enduring benefit from the payment made under the agreement.

The Hon’ble ITAT, Delhi held that the Appellant was already engaged in the manufacturing of motorcycle and Scooter and payment of royalty expenses was not with respect to setting up of manufacturing facility.

Further, the ITAT found that this issue is squarely covered in favour of the Appellant by the decision of the coordinate bench in Appellant’s own case for the assessment year 2015 -16 in ITA number (9073 del 2019) dated May 21, 2021 and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 1,591,781,250/– on account of capitalization of royalty expenses holding it to be revenue in nature.

(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.

Similar reads

TDS Credit shall be given for the assessment year for which income is assessable

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (“the ITAT”) in Archana Airways Ltd v. ITO [I.T.A. No. 8755/DEL/2019 dated November 2, 2022] held that Tax Deduction at Source (“TDS”) credit shall be given to

Dec-09-2021

Read More

Interest paid on belated payments of service tax is allowable for deduction u/s 37(1) IT Act

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai (“the ITAT”) in Prince Holdings Madras (P) Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax [ITA No.: 524/Chny/2021 dated November 2, 2022] held that the interest

Dec-09-2021

Read More

In case of change of AO, newly appointed AO shall continue proceeding from the stage where they were left by earlier AO

The Hon’ble Supreme Court ("the Supreme Court”) in the case of Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax New Delhi v. M/s Mastech Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Civil Appeal No. No. 8077 OF 2022) dated November 03, 202

Dec-09-2021

Read More

TDS credit to be allowed to Employee even if not deposited by the Employer

The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Kartik Vijaysinh Sonavane v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax [R/Special Civil Application No. 6193 of 2021 dated November 15, 2021] directed the Income-Tax

Dec-09-2021

Read More

Notice for re-assessment quashed by Hon’ble HC, Bombay as the Assessee fully, truly disclosed all material facts

In M/s Ananta Landmark Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. [W.P. (C) No. 2814 of 2019 decided on September 14, 2021] Hon’ble Bombay High Court held that for an assessment to be

Dec-09-2021

Read More