SHARE

| Oct-08-2021

Legitimate carry forward of ITC cannot be denied for non-filing of TRAN-1 – directed Department to permit filing of TRAN-1 till November 01, 2021

In M/s. Sunny Motors v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), Department of Revenue, Govt. of India and Others [W.P.(C) No.9348 of 2020 dated September 16, 2021], the current petition has been filed to direct the Department to accept the Goods and Services Tax (“GST”) TRAN-1 form under Rule 117 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (“CGST Rules”) and allow the Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) claimed by M/s. Sunny Motors (“the Petitioner”).

The Petitioner was unable to upload the GST TRAN-1 Form because of some “unavoidable and unforeseen circumstances” within the stipulated time, i.e., December 27, 2017. Due to which, a representation dated June 12, 2019 was made by the Petitioner praying that he be permitted to file the GST TRAN-1 Form manually pursuant to an Order W.P.(C) No.9269 of 2018 dated April 3, 2018 passed by the Hon’ble Orissa High Court. The Department vide a letter dated July 8, 2020 wrote to the Petitioner to submit his invoices in original along with proof of payment of Central Excise Duty to which the Petitioner replied that all documents had already been submitted and that TRAN-1 Form should be accepted. The Petitioner not having heard from the Department since has filed the current petition.

The Hon’ble Orissa High Court relied on the judgment of Aagman Services Private Limited v. Union of India [W.P. (C) No.1329 of 2019 dated November 21, 2019] which permitted the Petitioner in that case to submit his TRAN-1 Form either electronically or manually. Also relied on Adfert Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and others, [(2020) 73 GSTR 267] wherein it was observed that extension of date for submitting the declaration electronically on account of technical difficulties on the common portal is permissible under Rule 117(1A) of CGST Rules. The Adfert Technologies Judgment (supra) further provided “no body shall be denied to carry forward legitimate claim of ITC on the ground of non-filing of TRAN-1 by 27th December, 2017.

Taking note and placing reliance on the above mentioned judgments, the court directed the Department to either open the portal to allow the Petitioner to file TRAN-1 Form electronically on or before November 1, 2021 or to accept the form from the Petitioner manually before that date.

(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.

Similar reads

Appellant is entitled to interest from the date of deposit to the date of refund

The CESTAT, New Delhi in the matter of M/s BBM Impex Pvt. Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) [Customs Early Hearing Application No.50414 of 2022 with Customs Appeal No. 51662 of

Oct-08-2021

Read More

Waiver of pre-deposit is not tenable on account of financial inability

The CESTAT, New Delhi in the matter of M/s Prem Kumar Ojha v. Commissioner of Customs-Jaipur I [Customs Miscellaneous Application No. 50245 of 2022 dated July 04, 2022] held that, in view

Oct-08-2021

Read More

Excise duty cannot be demanded for clandestine removal based on third party evidence

The CESTAT, New Delhi in the matter of M/s Shri Shyam Ingot & Castings Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise [Excise Appeal No. 52550 of 2019-SM dated August 08, 2022] held

Oct-08-2021

Read More

Arbitrary valuation of goods not subjected to BIS specifications is invalid

The CESTAT, Chennai in the matter of M/s. SK Enterprises v The Commissioner of Customs [CUSTOMS APPEAL No. 40017 of 2022 dated June 24, 2022] set aside and held that the revaluation of the goods

Oct-08-2021

Read More

EOU not entitled to claim refund of TED on its own, may avail of the entitlements of DTA supplier specified in FTP

The Supreme Court of India in the matter of Sandoz Private Limited v. Union of India [Civil Appeal No. 3358 of 2020 dated January 4, 2020] upheld the decision of the Bombay High Court that Export

Oct-08-2021

Read More