/** * The main template file * * This is the most generic template file in a WordPress theme * and one of the two required files for a theme (the other being style.css). * It is used to display a page when nothing more specific matches a query. * E.g., it puts together the home page when no home.php file exists. * * @link https://developer.wordpress.org/themes/basics/template-hierarchy/ * * @package WordPress * @subpackage Tally * @since 1.0.0 */ ?>
The Hon’ble Orissa High Court (“Orissa HC”) in the matter of Smt. Smrutisudha Nayak v. Union of India and Others [W.P. (C) Nos. 10587 OF 2009 dated October 27, 2021], held that assessment proceedings cannot be initiated if no incriminating materials are seized at the time of the search.
Smrutisudha Nayak (“the Petitioner”) filed the petition challenging the initiation of the assessment proceedings under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the IT Act”). The Petitioner is a Director of a Private Limited Company in the name and style of Sambit Resorts Pvt. Ltd. On November 15, 2007, search was conducted by the Income Tax Department at the Petitioner’s residence in Bhubaneswar and a Panchnama was drawn up on that date. Subsequently another search warrant was issued under Section 132 (1) of the IT Act to conduct search and seizure operation of the locker standing jointly in the name of the Petitioner and her husband at Andhra Bank, Ashok Nagar Branch, Bhubaneswar.
Though the said search took place, nothing was found in the locker. The said search was not followed up immediately by a notice under Section 153A of the IT Act initiating search assessment proceedings. More than 18 months later, the Assessing Officer issued a notice on July 14, 2009 commencing assessment proceedings under Section 153A/ 143(3) of the IT Act for the Assessment Year 2002-2003. Identical notices were issued for each of the Assessment Year of 2008-2009. The Petitioner filed her returns for the said Assessment Years.
The Hon’ble Orissa High Court relied on the case Jai Steel (India) v. Assistant CIT [INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.53/2011 dated May 24, 2013] in which the Rajasthan High Court held that there being absolutely no incriminating materials found or seized at the time of the search, there was no justification for the initiation of assessment proceedings under Section 153A of the IT Act.
Further, the Court directed that the impugned notices issued to the Petitioner for the Assessment Year 2002-03 and 2008-09 under Section 153A(1) read with Sections 143(3) of the IT Act are hereby quashed. And the Petition is allowed.
(Author can be reached at email@example.com)
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.
The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in P.R Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s United Spirits Ltd. [I.T.A. No. 548/2015 c/w I.T.A No. 37/2010 decided on September 2, 2021] answered in favor
In Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sonu Realtors Private Limited [INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.956 OF 2017 dated October 11, 2021], Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (“the Appellant”) filed the appeal being
In Shri Shanthilal Movji Bhai Thakker v. The Income Tax Officer [ITA No. 2267-2270/Chny/2019 decided on November 3, 2021] Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai (“ITAT”) held that rental income from
In M/s. Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore [ITA 3064 /BANG/2018, decided on November 10, 2021], Hon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore (“ITAT”)
In Shri Rajeev Ratanlal Tulshyan v. Income Tax Officer [I.T.A. No.5748/Mum/2017 & Cross Objection No. No.118/Mum/2018 AY 2014-2015 dated October 01, 2021], the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”),