/** * The main template file * * This is the most generic template file in a WordPress theme * and one of the two required files for a theme (the other being style.css). * It is used to display a page when nothing more specific matches a query. * E.g., it puts together the home page when no home.php file exists. * * @link https://developer.wordpress.org/themes/basics/template-hierarchy/ * * @package WordPress * @subpackage Tally * @since 1.0.0 */ ?>
In M/S. Bright Star Plastic Industries v. Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax [W.P. (C) No. 15265 of 2021 dated October 04, 2021], M/S. Bright Star Plastic Industries ("the Petitioner") has filed a Petition against impugned Order dated April 05, 2021 passed by Additional Commissioner of CT & GST ("the Respondent") wherein the Respondent rejected the Petitioner's appeal questioning the Order passed by the Learned Proper Officer ("LPO") rejecting the Petitioner's application for revocation of cancellation of his GST Registration on January 07, 2021 under Section 30 (2) of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the OGST Act").
The Petitioner was involved in the business of manufacturing and trade of Poly Vinyl Chloride (“PVC”) pipes, iron scraps, etc. On August 14, 2020, the CT & GST Officer, Bhubaneswar (“the Respondent No.2”) issued a Show-Cause Notice (“SCN”) in Form GST REG-17 under Rule 22(1) of the OGST Rules, 2017 for cancellation of the Petitioner’s registration on the ground that:
“Registration has been obtained by means of fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts”.
In the case, the Petitioner contended that under Section 16 of the OGST Act and Rule 21 of the OGST Rules 2017, there is no provision that enables the cancellation of the registration of the purchasing dealer for any fraud committed by the selling dealer. Secondly, the Petitioner argued that the cancellation registration of the selling dealer M/s. Pawansut Enterprises took place only on October 01, 2019, long after the dates of the purchases made by the Petitioner from the said dealer. Therefore, it was submitted that on the date of purchases taking place, there was no way that the Petitioner would have known that at some future point in time, the registration of the selling dealer was going to be cancelled.
As opposed to the contentions made by the Petitioner, the Respondent argued that a field visit was undertaken to the address shown for the selling dealer, the premises were found to be occupied by some other person and not by the selling dealer. From the said visits which were undertaken on July 01, 2019, a conclusion was drawn that the transactions entered into by the Petitioner with the selling dealer in April and August 2018 were fake transactions.
After taking perusal of all the facts and evidences, the Honorable Orissa High Court (“the Orissa HC”) observed that the Respondent has failed to show that the Petitioner as a purchasing dealer deliberately availed the ITC in respect of the transactions with an entity knowing that such an entity was not in existence and on the basis of this observation, the Court revoked the GST Registration Cancellation.
(Author can be reached at email@example.com)
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.
In Union of India v. M/s Cummins Technologies India Pvt Ltd and Ors etc. [Transfer Petitions(Civil) Nos.1481-1482/2021 dated September 20, 2021] , the current transfer petitions have been filed
In M/S. ASR Hospitals (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. [W.P. No. 17415 of 2021 dated September 22, 2021], Andhra Pradesh Medical Services Infrastructure Development Corporation
In Naveen Kasera alias Naveen Agarwal v. Union of India Secretary Ministry of Finance W.P.(CRL) 630/2021 dated September 30, 2021] the current writ petition has been filed by Naveen Kasera alias
In M/S. Ghadshyam Enterprises v. Commissioner Central Goods & Services Tax [Service Tax Appeal No. 50783 of 2020 (SM) dated August 18, 2021], M/S. Ghadshyam Enterprises ("the Appellant") filed
In M/s. Fastrack Deal Comm Pvt. Ltd. [ADVANCE RULING NO. GUJ/GAAR/R/58/2020 dated July 30, 2020] M/s. Fastrack Deal Comm Pvt. Ltd. (“the Applicant”) after entering into a sale agreement to sell a fact