/** * The main template file * * This is the most generic template file in a WordPress theme * and one of the two required files for a theme (the other being style.css). * It is used to display a page when nothing more specific matches a query. * E.g., it puts together the home page when no home.php file exists. * * @link https://developer.wordpress.org/themes/basics/template-hierarchy/ * * @package WordPress * @subpackage Tally * @since 1.0.0 */ ?>
Section 16 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 36 of CGST Rules, 2017 provides for eligibility and conditions for taking ITC.
With an objective to curb fictious availment of ITC by taxpayers in GSTR 3B Return, the Government being unable to implement GSTR 2 & GSTR 3 Returns or New Returns systems, eventually introduced Rule 36(4) w.e.f. 09th October 2019 providing restriction on availment of ITC based on uploading of invoices by Supplier in GSTN Portal i.e., should appear GSTR 2A of taxpayer.
Historically most of GST amendments would bring lots of muddles and hullabaloos requiring clarifications. I have attempted to provide points to ponder around the same in the below Q&A style.
Q: What is Rule 36(4) restriction in simpler terms?
A: Taxpayer can avail ITC on the invoices in their monthly GSTR 3B Return to the extent of invoices uploaded by suppliers in their GSTR 1 i.e., available GSTR 2A of the taxpayer plus 20% (10% w.e.f. 01 January 2020) of the eligible credit in amount available in GSTR 2A.
Q: How to practically calculate the ITC to be availed in a period in line with restriction?
A: Let us take the month of October 2019,
Q: Whether filing of GSTR 1 by supplier is mandatory for restriction under Rule 36(4)?
A: Rule 36(4) says ITC is available on invoices which have been uploaded in GSTR 1 by the supplier, hence it appears that irrespective of GSTR 1 being filed or not by the supplier, once the invoice is available in GSTR 2A of the taxpayer it should be sufficient compliance of Rule 36(4). In other word the column heading with name “Counter Party Filing Status” in GSTR 2A auto-populated can be ignored.
Q: Whether the additional ITC (20% / 10%) to be availed each head wise i.e., IGST/CGST/SGST or on total basis?
A: The Government has not provided any clarification around the same, however, logically it appears that calculations of restriction and additional ITC availment should be each head wise only.
Q: Whether invoice-wise breakup is must for availing the additional ITC of 20%/10% as per Rule 36(4)?
A: Rule 36(4) provides for adhoc availment of additional 20%/10% of eligible matched credit, hence a proper invoice wise break-up is not necessary for compliance purposes. However practically, a taxpayer should ideally have proper break-up of invoices on which credit is availed under additional 20%/10% category to be have proper track of same for further reconciliations and assessment purposes.
Q: What happens when a taxpayer misses to download GSTR 2A of 12th of the succeeding month and does the reconciliation with 2A downloaded later after 12th?
A: GSTR 2A is a dynamic document which gets updated continuously based on filing of GSTR 1 by the suppliers. Hence, in my view, practically the proper officer would allow the ITC claimed based on late downloaded GSTR 2A considering the overall objective of availability in GSTR 2A is met.
Q: When to avail credit on invoices received from supplier’s filing GSTR 1 on quarterly basis?
A: Invoices uploaded by supplies in quarterly GSTR 1 would appear in the GSTR 2A of last month of quarter in which it is uploaded. Hence, the credit on the same can be availed belatedly in the last month of quarter only if not availed within the limit of additional 20%/10% credit.
Q: Whether the new introduced Form GSTR 2B at GSTN Portal will be helpful for calculation of credit as per Rule 36(4)?
A: GSTR 2B is a new version of GSTR 2A. It is a static auto-drafted document, say for the September 2020, it will contain all the invoices uploaded by supplier from 12th September to 11th October irrespective of the date of invoice or period in which it is uploaded by the Supplier.
In my view, for simple taxpayers, the GSTR 2B is boon and will immensely ease out their compliances for 36(4). However, for large/complex taxpayer, still GSTR 2A would be important for reconciliation of older invoices on which credit is availed late but filed timely by their supplier.
Q: What is the proviso introduced in Rule 36(4) providing relaxation from restriction?
A: In the wake of COVID-19 pandemic, the Government among other relaxations provided relaxation from complying with Rule 36(4) for the periods from February 2020 to August 2020 i.e., Credit can be availed as per Books during said period with a condition that cumulative adjustment as per Rule 36(4) of the credit availed during said period to be done during the filing of GSTR 3B of September 2020.
Q: How to calculate the cumulative adjustment to be done in case credit is availed as per Books during the period February 2020 to August 2020 as per the relaxation provided?
A: Let us take credit is availed in GSTR 3B as per Books during February to August 2020,
Q: Whether any liability to pay interest arises on the reversal made for differential excess ITC availed as seen in above example?
A: NO. If a taxpayer calculates cumulative adjustment to be done and reverse such excess ITC availed by the due date of filing GSTR 3B for the month of September 2020, then no interest is liable to be paid. In case, it is missed to be reversed by September 2020 GSTR 3B due date and reversal done in later months, then Interest is liable to be paid as it amounts to ineligible ITC availed.
Q: Whether the restriction provided in Rule 36(4) is valid when no such restriction is provided in the Act?
A: CGST Act does not provide any condition of reconciliation of ITC with GSTR 2A for availment in GSTR 3B. It can be argued that ITC is a vested right and subordinate legislations cannot override the benefit envisaged in the Act. Various Writ Petitions have been filed at Delhi, Gujarat and Rajasthan High Courts contending that Rule 36(4) is ultra vires to CGST Act.
Conclusion:
Due to the inability of Government to implement GSTR 2 / 3 Returns or New Returns system, it has passed on same compliance to be manually done by the taxpayers, which is burdensome on genuine taxpayers. Since the introduction of GSTR 3B, credit is being availed on self-assessment basis, thus Rule 36(4) restriction could have been implemented on a cumulative yearly basis easing out compliance burden on taxpayers. Further, the relaxation provided for the period February to August 2020 on account of COVID-19 Pandemic is a great step and Government should extend the same for some more time period.
Managing business finances isn’t just about bookkeeping—it also involves handling payments, tracking cash flow, and ensuring accurate reconciliation. While accounting has become more automated
Read More
The latest release of TallyPrime brings a suite of features that significantly simplify GST and reporting tasks. From creating ledgers with a click to tracking every GST-related activity, these
Read More
Direct Tax India is growing at an accelerated pace and people are undertaking multiple financial transactions. The Income Tax Department has established a robust framework of reporting of taxpayers'
Read More
The Finance (No.2) Bill, 2024 has proposed changes in the CGST Act, IGST Act, UTGST Act and GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 through Clauses 110 to 146 of the Bill in CGST Act 2017, through.....
Read More
The Hon’ble Union Minister for Finance and Corporate Affairs, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman, while presenting the Interim Budget 2024-25 in Parliament today asserted that by unifying the highly fragmented i
Read More