/** * The main template file * * This is the most generic template file in a WordPress theme * and one of the two required files for a theme (the other being style.css). * It is used to display a page when nothing more specific matches a query. * E.g., it puts together the home page when no home.php file exists. * * @link https://developer.wordpress.org/themes/basics/template-hierarchy/ * * @package WordPress * @subpackage Tally * @since 1.0.0 */ ?>
In NSSL (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, CGST & CE, Nagpur [FINAL ORDER NOS. A/86639-86640/2021 dated August 03, 2021], NSSL (P.) Ltd. (“the Appellant) has filed the current appeal being aggrieved against Order-in-Appeal dated November 14, 2018 (“OIA”) which rejected the refund applications made by the Appellant for claiming of refund of service tax paid under Reverse Charge Mechanism (“RCM”). The ground provided by the Service Tax Authorities for rejecting the refund application was that Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) can only be claimed under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”).
The Appellant failing to pay its Service Tax Liability under RCM in a stipulated time but shown as liability in the Service tax Return under the Finance Act, 1994, which was repealed and was replaced by the Goods and Services Tax (“GST”). Accordingly, the Authorities rejected the refund application which was filed under Central Value Added Tax Credit Rules, 2004 (“CENVAT Credit Rules”) on the ground that the credit can only be claimed under the CGST Act.
The Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) in the OIA has relied upon Section 142(8)(a) of the CGST Act however, as per the observations of the Hon’ble CESTAT, the matter is to be governed under the provisions of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act which provides for Miscellaneous Transitional Provisions applicable in the current case.
Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, which mentions any claim filed by any person for refund of CENVAT Credit will be disposed of under the provisions of existing law i.e, Central Excise Act, 1944 (“the CE Act”). It implies that an assessee can file an application to claim refund of CENVAT credit and such application would be disposed of in accordance with the CE Act. The Hon’ble CESTAT relying on this provision noted that the “Authorities have not questioned the issue regarding the entitlement of the Appellant to the CENVAT Credit under the erstwhile CENVAT statute.”
Further opined that the Appellants should be allowed the benefit of refund of service tax paid by it, thereby, setting aside the OIA and allowing the current appeal.
Online GST Course by Bimal Jain
Recorded: Certified Advanced GST Course
Course Details: Certificate of Participation will be Provided, Free GST Updates on E-mail, WhatsApp, Telegram for 1 Year, Background Material and PPT will be Provided on the downloadable basis, Total 21 Recorded Sessions (60 Hours), will be available for 120 hours or 60 Days whichever expires earlier.
For Registration:- https://cutt.ly/hxjl5Cu
Recorded: GST Course on Exports, Deemed Exports, SEZ, Imports, Merchandise Exports, Inverted Duty Structure (including Refunds)
Course Details: 6 Online Recorded Sessions of 2.30Hrs each with Background Material (BGM)
For Registration:- https://cutt.ly/pvw7mzl
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.
In Union of India v. M/s Cummins Technologies India Pvt Ltd and Ors etc. [Transfer Petitions(Civil) Nos.1481-1482/2021 dated September 20, 2021] , the current transfer petitions have been filed
In M/S. ASR Hospitals (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. [W.P. No. 17415 of 2021 dated September 22, 2021], Andhra Pradesh Medical Services Infrastructure Development Corporation
In M/S. Bright Star Plastic Industries v. Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax [W.P. (C) No. 15265 of 2021 dated October 04, 2021], M/S. Bright Star Plastic Industries ("the Petitioner") has filed
In Naveen Kasera alias Naveen Agarwal v. Union of India Secretary Ministry of Finance W.P.(CRL) 630/2021 dated September 30, 2021] the current writ petition has been filed by Naveen Kasera alias
In M/S. Ghadshyam Enterprises v. Commissioner Central Goods & Services Tax [Service Tax Appeal No. 50783 of 2020 (SM) dated August 18, 2021], M/S. Ghadshyam Enterprises ("the Appellant") filed