/** * The main template file * * This is the most generic template file in a WordPress theme * and one of the two required files for a theme (the other being style.css). * It is used to display a page when nothing more specific matches a query. * E.g., it puts together the home page when no home.php file exists. * * @link https://developer.wordpress.org/themes/basics/template-hierarchy/ * * @package WordPress * @subpackage Tally * @since 1.0.0 */ ?>
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Platinum Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner of GST & Central Excise [W.P.No.13284 of 2020 decided on August 11, 2021] has held that a Special Economic Zone (“SEZ”) falls withing the meaning of ‘any person’ under the provisions of Section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST Act”) dealing with applications for refund read with Rule 89(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (“CGST Rules”).
Platinum Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (“the Petitioner”), a SEZ, had filed applications for refund of the taxes erroneously remitted by it on various dates to its suppliers. A show cause notice was issued where the locus of the Petitioner to claim the refund was questioned on ground that as per Section 54 of the CGST Act read with Rule 89 of CGST Rules, only a supplier of services would be entitled to claim refund and not the SEZ itself.
The Petitioner contended that it had committed an error by remitting the taxes on the supplies made to it as the supplies being made to it were zero rated supplies exempt from tax. It was further contended that the reference in Section 54 of the CGST Act to 'any person' and would include the SEZ as well and accordingly, it shall be entitled to claim the refund of erroneously remitted tax.
The Hon’ble Madras High Court held that the statutory scheme for refund under the CGST Act and State GST Acts, permits any entity to seek a refund of taxes, including an SEZ. It was observed that the provisions of Section 54 of the CGST Act, providing for a refund, apply to any person who claims such refund and who makes an application for the grant of the same. Thus, it was held that in the present case, the Petitioner shall fall within the meaning of ‘any person’ as enumerated under Section 54 of the CGST Act and accordingly, shall be eligible to seek refund of the taxes paid by it.
(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.
The Hon’ble Union Minister for Finance and Corporate Affairs, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman, while presenting the Interim Budget 2024-25 in Parliament today asserted that by unifying the highly fragmented i
Read More
The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) ushers in a transformative update to the GSTR-1 return, unveiling two pivotal tables – Table 14 and Table 15.
Read More
The latest release of TallyPrime is loaded with key features such as GST reconciliation ( GSTR-2A, GSTR-2B, and GSTR-1), multi-GSTIN support in a single company, powerful report filters, and..........
Read More
Key Recommendations of the 52nd GST Council Meeting: All You Need To Know 📌 A. Recommendations relating to GST rates on goods and services: 📢 I. Changes in GST rates of goods: ➡️ GST rates for "F
Read More
NIC has published the following error codes, error message, the reasons for the errors and the corresponding resolutions to help you resolve errors faced during e-Invoice upload to the NIC portal.
Read More